Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- seceng-course-exp-2012 [2014/07/16 14:49] – [Results] martina.degramatica@unitn.it
+++ seceng-course-exp-2012 [2021/01/29 10:58] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 An experiment by Katsyarina Labunets, Fabio Massacci, Federica Paci, Le Minh Sang Tran.
-This page provides additional resources that enable replication of our work published at {{:research_activities:experiments:2013-seceng:labunets-esem-2013-accepted.pdf|ESEM 2013}}.
+This page provides additional resources that enable replication of our work published at {{:research_activities:experiments:2013-seceng:labunets-esem-2013-accepted.pdf|ESEM 2013}}. See the [[validation_of_risk_and_security_requirements_methodologies|main page]] for our work on empirical validation of security risk assessment methods and other experiments.
 ===== Goals =====
 The goal of the experiment was to evaluate and compare two types of risk-driven methods, namely, visual methods (CORAS) and textual methods (SREP) with respect to their //effectiveness// in identifying threats and security requirements, and the //participants’ perception// of the two methods.
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
   * For privacy reasons, at the beginning of the experiment a {{:research_activities:experiments:2013-seceng:consent-form-security-engineering.docx|Consent Form}} was administered to participants.
   * Participants' results have been assessed by methods and domain experts (see {{:research_activities:experiments:2013-seceng:evaluation_sheet.xlsx|Evaluation Score Sheet}}).
+  *
+**Data collected during the experiment are available upon request.**