User Tools
sid-2015-tutorial
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
sid-2015-tutorial [2015/09/17 19:09] fabio.massacci@unitn.it [EMFASE Security Risk Assessment Tutorial and Exercise] |
sid-2015-tutorial [2021/01/29 10:58] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| - | **//The EMFASE Consortium is glad to invite you to the EMFASE Security Risk Assessment Tutorial and Hands-On Exercise to be held {{http://www.sesarinnovationdays.eu/SESAR INNOVATION DAYS}} in Bologna on the 02-12-2015!//** | + | **//The EMFASE Consortium is glad to invite you to the EMFASE Security Risk Assessment Tutorial and Hands-On Exercise to be held on the {{http://www.sesarinnovationdays.eu/SESAR INNOVATION DAYS}} in Bologna on the 02-12-2015!//** |
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| The empirical framework will include an integrated process and detailed guidelines for how to select the risk assessment method best suited for a particular situation, e.g., concept under assessment and its maturity level, involved stakeholders, time and budget constraints, level of expertise of the Risk Assessment facilitator, etc. | The empirical framework will include an integrated process and detailed guidelines for how to select the risk assessment method best suited for a particular situation, e.g., concept under assessment and its maturity level, involved stakeholders, time and budget constraints, level of expertise of the Risk Assessment facilitator, etc. | ||
| - | In order to develop the empirical evaluation framework and draw the guidelines, EMFASE classifies, evaluates and compares different Risk Assessment methods in terms of performance, measurable security impact, usability, and economy. Different Risk Assessment methods will be applied on different application scenarios. | + | In order to develop the empirical evaluation framework and draw the guidelines, EMFASE classifies, evaluates and compares different Risk Assessment methods in terms of performance, measurable security impact, usability, and economy. |
| + | |||
| + | Read some of our past studies | ||
| + | * Our framework for Security Risk Assessment Methods in the ATM domain. Published at SESAR Innovation Days 2014. {{http://www.sesarinnovationdays.eu/sites/default/files/media/SIDs/SID%202014-40.pdf|Paper}} and {{http://www.sesarinnovationdays.eu/sites/default/files/SID%202014-40%20slides.pdf|Slides}} | ||
| + | * An experiment on the effectiveness of Security Catalogues for ATM practitioners. Published at REFSQ 2015. {{:research_activities:experiments:2014-rome-deepblue:gramatica-etal-refsq2015.pdf|Paper}} and {{:research_activities:experiments:2014-rome-deepblue:mass-2015-refsq.pdf|Slides}} | ||
| + | * An experiment on the effectiveness of Security Catalogues for Novices. Published at EmpiRE 2015. {{:research_activities:experiments:2014-winter-school:labunets-etal-empire-re15-preprint.pdf|Paper}} and {{:research_activities:experiments:2014-winter-school:labunets-empire2015-slides.PDF|Slides}} | ||
| + | * An experiment on the effectiveness of Security Risk Assessment Methods. Published at EmpiRE 2014. {{:research_activities:experiments:labunets-etal-empire-re14-preprint.pdf|Paper}} and {{:research_activities:experiments:2014-seceng:paci-2014-empire.pdf|Slides}} | ||
| ===== Focus of the tutorial ===== | ===== Focus of the tutorial ===== | ||
sid-2015-tutorial.1442509797.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/01/29 10:58 (external edit)
Page Tools
