User Tools

Site Tools


seceng-course-exp-2012

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

seceng-course-exp-2012 [2014/07/17 11:50]
martina.degramatica@unitn.it [Additional Material]
seceng-course-exp-2012 [2015/11/05 18:50] (current)
katsiaryna.labunets@unitn.it [An Experimental Comparison of Two Risk-Based Security Methods]
Line 3: Line 3:
 An experiment by Katsyarina Labunets, Fabio Massacci, Federica Paci, Le Minh Sang Tran. An experiment by Katsyarina Labunets, Fabio Massacci, Federica Paci, Le Minh Sang Tran.
  
-This page provides additional resources that enable replication of our work published at {{:research_activities:experiments:2013-seceng:labunets-esem-2013-accepted.pdf|ESEM 2013}}.+This page provides additional resources that enable replication of our work published at {{:research_activities:experiments:2013-seceng:labunets-esem-2013-accepted.pdf|ESEM 2013}}. See the [[validation_of_risk_and_security_requirements_methodologies|main page]] for our work on empirical validation of security risk assessment methods and other experiments.
 ===== Goals ===== ===== Goals =====
 The goal of the experiment was to evaluate and compare two types of risk-driven methods, namely, visual methods (CORAS) and textual methods (SREP) with respect to their //effectiveness// in identifying threats and security requirements, and the //participants’ perception// of the two methods. The goal of the experiment was to evaluate and compare two types of risk-driven methods, namely, visual methods (CORAS) and textual methods (SREP) with respect to their //effectiveness// in identifying threats and security requirements, and the //participants’ perception// of the two methods.
seceng-course-exp-2012.txt · Last modified: 2015/11/05 18:50 by katsiaryna.labunets@unitn.it