This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
opinion_accreditation [2018/06/26 14:49] fabio.massacci@unitn.it [Homeworks for the reader] |
opinion_accreditation [2021/01/29 10:58] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* 15hrs of //Cryptography//, | * 15hrs of //Cryptography//, | ||
* 32hrs of //NetworkForensics//, | * 32hrs of //NetworkForensics//, | ||
- | * [...] | + | * ... |
* 20hrs of //NoQuestionNoLie// and | * 20hrs of //NoQuestionNoLie// and | ||
* 2hrs of //BendYourKnee//. | * 2hrs of //BendYourKnee//. | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
You have to collect all reasonable areas and extend them to few pages of <del>rant</del> detailed description that extend into a document showing that 20hrs of //BendYouKnee (US)// are more or less the same as 15hrs of //KissMyHand (UK)//. | You have to collect all reasonable areas and extend them to few pages of <del>rant</del> detailed description that extend into a document showing that 20hrs of //BendYouKnee (US)// are more or less the same as 15hrs of //KissMyHand (UK)//. | ||
- | It might be that multple nations are involved in which case a world **TheG&TheG Committe** of <del>you and some chum of yours</del> reknown scientists] then show that 15hrs with 6hrs Lab //KissMYHand (UK// are equal to 25hrs of //BaciaManinaTestaChina (IT)// and 2liters of //GewurzTraminerHalbTrocken (AT)//. | + | It might be that multple nations are involved in which case <del>you and some chum of yours</del> **TheG&TheG Committe** of reknown scientists then show that 15hrs with 6hrs Lab //KissMYHand (UK)// are equal to 25hrs of //BaciaManinaTestaChina (IT)// and 2liters of //GewurzTraminerHalbTrocken (AT)//. |
- | So we end with an "aligned educational feamework" and X is happy to recommend, make it mandatory, whatever to all its stakeholders. | + | So we end with an "aligned educational feamework" and X is happy to recommend it, make it mandatory, whatever to all its stakeholders. |
==== Potential Impact on the World if You Make a Mistake ==== | ==== Potential Impact on the World if You Make a Mistake ==== | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
You shouldn't be worried of bringing nations to racks and ruins as | You shouldn't be worried of bringing nations to racks and ruins as | ||
- | * academics will ignore it wholesale because the 17hrs of //SwirlYouHead// taugth by the chair //Prof.Dr.Eng. J.H. Knowsall// of their **TheG&TheG** Commitee is not included as you didn't know it existed ("Oh My God, how can one possibly graduate without that? I mean, really...") | + | * Academics will ignore it wholesale because the 17hrs of //SwirlYouHead// taugth by //Prof.Dr.Eng. J.H. Knowsall// chair of nation Z **TheG&TheG** Committee is not included as you didn't know it existed ("Oh My God, how can one possibly graduate without that? I mean, really...") |
* Companies will ignore it as well but will set a parallel parrot bogus test that costs a lot of money because it shows that the candidate is an entrepreneurial type and will do whatever to get the job (including answering questions wrong). | * Companies will ignore it as well but will set a parallel parrot bogus test that costs a lot of money because it shows that the candidate is an entrepreneurial type and will do whatever to get the job (including answering questions wrong). | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
==== Homeworks for the reader==== | ==== Homeworks for the reader==== | ||
- | - Prove that finding similar topics in "Software and Security Engineering" Syllabi as taught by X [fellow of this and that, whatever impact awards] and by Y [=another fellow of that and this who disagrees with X and has an equally sizeable chunk of impact awards] is NP-hard. | + | - Prove that finding similar topics in "Software and Security Engineering" Syllabi as taught by X [LeftRight Fellow, impact award, and most cited paper ever] and by Y [UpsandDowns Fellow, with an equally sizeable pile of impact awards and cited papers] is NP-hard. |
- Prove by DNA sequencing that members of accreditation bodies and shopkeepers selling picks and mules to gold diggers in California belong to the same genetic pool. | - Prove by DNA sequencing that members of accreditation bodies and shopkeepers selling picks and mules to gold diggers in California belong to the same genetic pool. | ||